40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-8.15
Negative P/E while VET shows 25.02. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
13.27
Similar P/S to VET's 16.86. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
2.99
Similar P/B to VET's 3.62. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-37.26
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 3229.13. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
41.56
P/OCF above 1.5x VET's 27.36. Michael Burry would check for operating cash flow deterioration risks.
2.99
Similar fair value ratio to VET's 3.62. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-3.07%
Negative earnings while VET shows yield of 1.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-2.68%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.