40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
9.75
Positive P/E while VET shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.31
P/S 50-75% of VET's 21.64. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
1.65
P/B less than half of VET's 3.44. David Dodd would verify if asset quality justifies this discount.
-98.82
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 184.07. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
32.11
Similar P/OCF to VET's 37.99. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.65
Fair value ratio less than half of VET's 3.44. David Dodd would verify if competitive position justifies this discount.
2.56%
Positive earnings while VET shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
-1.01%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.