40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-14.57
Negative P/E while VET shows 165.78. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
11.03
P/S 50-75% of VET's 18.06. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
1.98
P/B 50-75% of VET's 3.72. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-95.32
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 78.11. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
36.17
Similar P/OCF to VET's 38.03. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.98
Fair value ratio 50-75% of VET's 3.72. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-1.72%
Negative earnings while VET shows yield of 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-1.05%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.