1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.13%
Some net income increase while AAG.DE is negative at -1826.01%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-85.48%
Negative yoy D&A while AAG.DE is 49.37%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-564.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AAG.DE at -183.85%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while AAG.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-206.20%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AAG.DE at -81.42%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
8.44%
AP growth of 8.44% while AAG.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-101.60%
Negative yoy usage while AAG.DE is 51.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
5459.41%
Well above AAG.DE's 128.10%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
334.07%
Some CFO growth while AAG.DE is negative at -422.94%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
99.96%
CapEx growth well above AAG.DE's 5.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AAG.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-798650.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while AAG.DE is 100.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-69.35%
We reduce yoy invests while AAG.DE stands at 78.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.03%
Negative yoy issuance while AAG.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.