1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-270.67%
Negative net income growth while AAG.DE stands at 1021.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-98.35%
Negative yoy D&A while AAG.DE is 3.04%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.85%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AAG.DE is 330.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.85%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AAG.DE at -228.95%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-118.85%
Negative yoy AP while AAG.DE is 285.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-150.51%
Negative yoy usage while AAG.DE is 285.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
259.79%
Well above AAG.DE's 16.59%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
17.79%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AAG.DE's 265.99%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-26.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AAG.DE at -163.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-400.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AAG.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-103.88%
We reduce yoy other investing while AAG.DE is 759.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-103.61%
We reduce yoy invests while AAG.DE stands at 695.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.26%
Negative yoy issuance while AAG.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.