PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
54.10%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AAG.DE's 38.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
7620.77%
Some D&A expansion while AAG.DE is negative at -1.58%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-519.48%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AAG.DE is 136.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
318.27%
Some inventory rise while AAG.DE is negative at -29.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
Lower AP growth vs. AAG.DE's 348.75%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-2386.80%
Negative yoy usage while AAG.DE is 348.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-99.59%
Both negative yoy, with AAG.DE at -28.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-50.75%
Negative yoy CFO while AAG.DE is 168.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
82.54%
Some CapEx rise while AAG.DE is negative at -51.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AAG.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.74%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AAG.DE's 200.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
81.74%
We have mild expansions while AAG.DE is negative at -51.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
4.80%
We repay more while AAG.DE is negative at -1135.21%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
835.40%
Issuance growth of 835.40% while AAG.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.