PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2609.03%
Negative net income growth while PGN.DE stands at 1025.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-22.60%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PGN.DE at -2.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PGN.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.01%
Slight usage while PGN.DE is negative at -82.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-147.78%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PGN.DE at -173.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
147.78%
Inventory growth well above PGN.DE's 83.92%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
61.14%
AP growth of 61.14% while PGN.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
1803.94%
Some yoy usage while PGN.DE is negative at -483.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-154.00%
Both negative yoy, with PGN.DE at -1198.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
73.48%
Some CFO growth while PGN.DE is negative at -140.61%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-10.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with PGN.DE at -76.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23800.00%
Acquisition growth of 23800.00% while PGN.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.98%
We reduce yoy other investing while PGN.DE is 100.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-8.74%
We reduce yoy invests while PGN.DE stands at 8.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PGN.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.