PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.13%
Net income growth under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 1501.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-85.48%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VPLAY-B.ST at -1.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-564.33%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VPLAY-B.ST is 184.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-206.20%
Negative yoy inventory while VPLAY-B.ST is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
8.44%
AP growth of 8.44% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-101.60%
Negative yoy usage while VPLAY-B.ST is 184.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
5459.41%
Some yoy increase while VPLAY-B.ST is negative at -24560.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
334.07%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 249.91%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
99.96%
CapEx growth well above VPLAY-B.ST's 8.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-798650.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while VPLAY-B.ST is 164.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-69.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with VPLAY-B.ST at -346.30%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.03%
Negative yoy issuance while VPLAY-B.ST is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.