PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
54.10%
Some net income increase while VPLAY-B.ST is negative at -1943.75%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7620.77%
D&A growth well above VPLAY-B.ST's 2.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-519.48%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VPLAY-B.ST is 177.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
318.27%
Inventory growth of 318.27% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-2386.80%
Negative yoy usage while VPLAY-B.ST is 177.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-99.59%
Negative yoy while VPLAY-B.ST is 4980.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-50.75%
Negative yoy CFO while VPLAY-B.ST is 131.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
82.54%
CapEx growth well above VPLAY-B.ST's 20.69%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.74%
We have some outflow growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative at -75.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
81.74%
Investing outflow well above VPLAY-B.ST's 16.67%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
4.80%
We repay more while VPLAY-B.ST is negative at -204.33%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
835.40%
Issuance growth of 835.40% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.