PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Positive revenue growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-100.00%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-100.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-100.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-100.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-100.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while AAG.DE is at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-16.60%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 52.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-16.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 54.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-16.60%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 19.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 12.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-114.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is 156.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-114.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE is 582.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while AAG.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.