PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
0.00%
Positive EBIT growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-13.47%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-0.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.18%
OCF growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 0.19%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
102.27%
Positive FCF growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
66.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AAG.DE's 52.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
66.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AAG.DE's 54.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
66.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 19.10%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.22%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 12.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-128.22%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is 156.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-128.22%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE is 582.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.43%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.