1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
160.23%
Positive revenue growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-726.98%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-717.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-667.74%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-388.30%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-387.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-387.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while AAG.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 52.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
117.02%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 54.69%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
117.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 19.10%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.89%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 12.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-168.89%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is 156.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-168.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE is 582.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-57.70%
Inventory is declining while AAG.DE stands at 1.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
14.68%
Positive asset growth while AAG.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-108.51%
We have a declining book value while AAG.DE shows 9.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
47.36%
We have some new debt while AAG.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
174.48%
We expand SG&A while AAG.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.