1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.04%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.10%
Positive gross profit growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
155.61%
Positive EBIT growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-342.17%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
159.60%
Positive net income growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
154.23%
Positive EPS growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
154.23%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
10.00%
Slight or no buybacks while AAG.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
10.00%
Slight or no buyback while AAG.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
OCF growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 0.19%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-1547.13%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
195.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 52.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
195.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 54.69%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
195.80%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 19.10%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.35%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 12.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-25.35%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is 156.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-25.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE is 582.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.99%
Inventory is declining while AAG.DE stands at 1.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-35.24%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
341.70%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 9.27%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-80.42%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.79%
We expand SG&A while AAG.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.