PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-69.22%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
51.02%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 1.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-579.48%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
42.36%
Positive operating income growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-543.23%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-548.72%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-548.72%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.79%
Positive OCF growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-96.42%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-54.47%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-54.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-54.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-265.42%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-265.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-265.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.16%
Firm’s AR is declining while AAG.DE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
340.13%
Inventory growth of 340.13% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-8.06%
Negative asset growth while AAG.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-52.70%
We have a declining book value while AAG.DE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19.06%
Debt growth of 19.06% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.15%
SG&A growth well above AAG.DE's 18.29%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.