PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
601.18%
Positive revenue growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
411.37%
Positive gross profit growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
26.24%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 11.24%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
26.24%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 10.33%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
23.25%
Positive net income growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.83%
Slight or no buybacks while AAG.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.83%
Slight or no buyback while AAG.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.65%
Positive OCF growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
35.15%
Positive FCF growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
272.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 3.72%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
717.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 3.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
23.05%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.19%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 107.47%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-28.88%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-194.37%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
42.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
61.06%
Positive short-term CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.36%
Equity/share CAGR of 96.36% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-76.79%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AAG.DE is at 5.37%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.63%
Firm’s AR is declining while AAG.DE shows 8.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-85.68%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-37.06%
Negative asset growth while AAG.DE invests at 2.33%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.82%
We have a declining book value while AAG.DE shows 6.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-13.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AAG.DE's 2.70%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.