PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.19%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
146.58%
Positive gross profit growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
63.31%
Positive EBIT growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
63.31%
Positive operating income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
75.50%
Positive net income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
75.28%
Positive EPS growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
75.28%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while FYB.DE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
465.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 129265.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
239.26%
5Y CAGR of 239.26% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-15.87%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 34.87%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-86.07%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 548.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-257.95%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-459.79%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-243.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is 49.43%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1144.44%
Equity/share CAGR of 1144.44% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
219.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FYB.DE's 110.45%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.98%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
530.87%
We show growth while FYB.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-22.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-11.69%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-46.94%
We’re deleveraging while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.84%
We cut SG&A while FYB.DE invests at 1.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.