PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
601.18%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 14.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
411.37%
Positive gross profit growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
26.24%
Positive EBIT growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
26.24%
Positive operating income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.25%
Positive net income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.83%
Share count expansion well above FYB.DE's 0.42%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.83%
Diluted share count expanding well above FYB.DE's 0.42%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.65%
Positive OCF growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
35.15%
Positive FCF growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
272.26%
10Y CAGR of 272.26% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
717.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FYB.DE's 90.50%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
23.05%
Positive 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-28.88%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-194.37%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
42.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
61.06%
Positive short-term CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with FYB.DE's 103.98%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
-76.79%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 50.14%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.63%
Firm’s AR is declining while FYB.DE shows 37.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-85.68%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-37.06%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.82%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-13.05%
We’re deleveraging while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
We expand SG&A while FYB.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.