PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.85%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
115.90%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 41.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
110.47%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 68.23%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
110.47%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 23.09%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
103.34%
Net income growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 67.49%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
102.75%
EPS growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 67.39%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
102.75%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 67.39%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
20.03%
Share count expansion well above FYB.DE's 0.17%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
20.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above FYB.DE's 0.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
452.94%
10Y CAGR of 452.94% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-17.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 27.46%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-34.57%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.51%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-34.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-94.74%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-95.21%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 5.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
101.09%
Positive short-term CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.62%
Below 50% of FYB.DE's 121.21%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-63.99%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 44.85%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.69%
Our AR growth while FYB.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-68.52%
Inventory is declining while FYB.DE stands at 114.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
30.73%
Positive asset growth while FYB.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
13.43%
Positive BV/share change while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
57.90%
Debt growth of 57.90% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FYB.DE's 22.69%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.