PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
601.18%
Positive revenue growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
411.37%
Positive gross profit growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
26.24%
Positive EBIT growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
26.24%
Positive operating income growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.25%
Positive net income growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.83%
Share change of 0.83% while PGN.DE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.83%
Diluted share change of 0.83% while PGN.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.65%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x PGN.DE's 23.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
35.15%
FCF growth under 50% of PGN.DE's 180.86%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
272.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PGN.DE's 100.49%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
717.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PGN.DE's 36.20%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
23.05%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-28.88%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PGN.DE stands at 112.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-194.37%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
42.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
61.06%
Positive short-term CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.36%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-76.79%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.63%
Firm’s AR is declining while PGN.DE shows 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-85.68%
Inventory is declining while PGN.DE stands at 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-37.06%
Negative asset growth while PGN.DE invests at 0.74%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.82%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-13.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PGN.DE's 33.45%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.