PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.85%
Negative revenue growth while PGN.DE stands at 15.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
115.90%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 12.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
110.47%
Positive EBIT growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
110.47%
Positive operating income growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
103.34%
Net income growth at 75-90% of PGN.DE's 128.43%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
102.75%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PGN.DE's 71.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
102.75%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PGN.DE's 71.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
20.03%
Share change of 20.03% while PGN.DE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
20.00%
Diluted share change of 20.00% while PGN.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
452.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PGN.DE's 197.71%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-17.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PGN.DE stands at 35.19%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-34.57%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.51%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-34.82%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PGN.DE stands at 135.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-94.74%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PGN.DE is at 275.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
101.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PGN.DE's 140.00%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.62%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-63.99%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.69%
AR growth well above PGN.DE's 15.57%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-68.52%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
30.73%
Positive asset growth while PGN.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
13.43%
Under 50% of PGN.DE's 1179.46%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
57.90%
We have some new debt while PGN.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
SG&A growth well above PGN.DE's 13.36%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.