PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.82%
Positive revenue growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
422.90%
Positive gross profit growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-81.36%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-81.36%
Negative operating income growth while PGN.DE is at 148.13%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-91.09%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-84.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-84.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.18%
Share change of 4.18% while PGN.DE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
4.18%
Diluted share change of 4.18% while PGN.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PGN.DE's 102.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-56.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-44.81%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.82%
Below 50% of PGN.DE's 148.52%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
400.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PGN.DE's 1039.09%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-487.40%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-339.14%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-145.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PGN.DE is 94.15%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.62%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-89.93%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.79%
Our AR growth while PGN.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
27.02%
We show growth while PGN.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-3.64%
Negative asset growth while PGN.DE invests at 8.32%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-75.81%
We have a declining book value while PGN.DE shows 138.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.73%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PGN.DE's 53.96%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.68%
We expand SG&A while PGN.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.