1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
638.68%
Positive revenue growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
151.45%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 61.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
135.18%
EBIT growth similar to VPLAY-B.ST's 124.67%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
132.19%
Operating income growth similar to VPLAY-B.ST's 131.58%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
133.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 60.80%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
132.76%
EPS growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 60.81%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
132.76%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 60.81%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
572.60%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
572.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 40.70%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
706.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 14.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
341.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 81.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
9.82%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
9.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
878.41%
Positive short-term CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
655.76%
Positive short-term equity growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20280.38%
AR growth well above VPLAY-B.ST's 488.68%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
45.93%
Asset growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 5.90%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
36.86%
Positive BV/share change while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
59.27%
We have some new debt while VPLAY-B.ST reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.79%
We expand SG&A while VPLAY-B.ST cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.