PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
414 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.45%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-264.59%
Negative gross profit growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 61.94%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-301.28%
Negative EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 124.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-318.02%
Negative operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 131.58%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-309.71%
Negative net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 60.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-303.49%
Negative EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-303.49%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
5.00%
Slight or no buybacks while VPLAY-B.ST is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
5.00%
Slight or no buyback while VPLAY-B.ST is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.53%
Negative OCF growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 224.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-28.36%
Negative FCF growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 220.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
180.40%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
180.40%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 40.70%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
236.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 14.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 81.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-209.66%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-209.66%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-677.32%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while VPLAY-B.ST shows 488.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
Asset growth well under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 5.90%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
89.80%
Positive BV/share change while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-19.92%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.76%
We expand SG&A while VPLAY-B.ST cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.