PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.83%
Negative revenue growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 6.65%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
176.38%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 11.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-34.51%
Negative EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 89.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-34.40%
Negative operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 108.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-34.26%
Negative net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 108.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-33.33%
Negative EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 108.47%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 109.31%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 0.38%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.92%
Negative OCF growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 460.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-117.68%
Negative FCF growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 375.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
192.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 5.90%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
250.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 5.90%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
541.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 5.90%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.79%
Positive OCF/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-86.07%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-422.31%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is at 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-2184.65%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-94.84%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
391.36%
Equity/share CAGR of 391.36% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while VPLAY-B.ST shows 13.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-97.41%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-32.60%
Negative asset growth while VPLAY-B.ST invests at 11.39%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-19.80%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
2.56%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VPLAY-B.ST's 11.05%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.61%
We expand SG&A while VPLAY-B.ST cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.