1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.83%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-52.62%
Cost reduction while AAG.DE shows 14.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
176.38%
Positive growth while AAG.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
210.43%
Margin expansion while AAG.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
902.02%
Operating expenses growth while AAG.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.12%
Total costs reduction while AAG.DE shows 1.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-44.35%
D&A reduction while AAG.DE shows 1.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-105.37%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-107.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
99.99%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 59.72%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-34.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
114.26%
Tax expense growth while AAG.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-34.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.00%
Share count increase while AAG.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.