PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-39.55%
Revenue decline while AAG.DE shows 25.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-50.99%
Cost reduction while AAG.DE shows 51.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.50%
Positive growth while AAG.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
69.57%
Margin expansion while AAG.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.86%
Operating expenses reduction while AAG.DE shows 51.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-36.83%
Total costs reduction while AAG.DE shows 51.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-170.96%
D&A reduction while AAG.DE shows 65.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-527.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-807.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.44%
Operating income growth while AAG.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.17%
Other expenses growth while AAG.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.37%
Pre-tax income growth while AAG.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.89%
Tax expense reduction while AAG.DE shows 118.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
32.34%
Net income growth while AAG.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.86%
EPS growth while AAG.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.86%
Diluted EPS growth while AAG.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Share count change of 20.00% while AAG.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
20.00%
Diluted share change of 20.00% while AAG.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.