PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AAG.DE's 11.50%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-75.61%
Cost reduction while AAG.DE shows 13.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
422.90%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AAG.DE's 8.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
360.78%
Margin expansion while AAG.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while AAG.DE shows 17.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
4389.34%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 17.11%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
37.76%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 14.36%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.75%
D&A growth less than half of AAG.DE's 91.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-21.76%
EBITDA decline while AAG.DE shows 50.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.82%
EBITDA margin decline while AAG.DE shows 35.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
38.25%
Other expenses growth while AAG.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-80.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
105.56%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 3.72%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-91.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-84.62%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-84.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.18%
Share count reduction below 50% of AAG.DE's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
4.18%
Diluted share change of 4.18% while AAG.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.