PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.45%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
7.83%
Cost increase while FYB.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-264.59%
Gross profit decline while FYB.DE shows 58.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-288.00%
Margin decline while FYB.DE shows 110.90% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.81%
Other expenses change of 90.81% while FYB.DE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-6.41%
Operating expenses reduction while FYB.DE shows 17.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.64%
Total costs growth while FYB.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.53%
Interest expense change of 17.53% while FYB.DE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-3.81%
D&A reduction while FYB.DE shows 8.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-26.63%
EBITDA decline while FYB.DE shows 1.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-318.02%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-349.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.46%
Other expenses growth while FYB.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-302.32%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-331.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-158.05%
Tax expense reduction while FYB.DE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-309.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-339.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-303.49%
EPS decline while FYB.DE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-303.49%
Diluted EPS decline while FYB.DE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.00%
Share count increase while FYB.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.00%
Diluted share increase while FYB.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.