PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.19%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-39.33%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
146.58%
Positive growth while FYB.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
154.71%
Margin expansion while FYB.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.55%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FYB.DE's 37.81%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-21.13%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.02%
D&A reduction while FYB.DE shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1226.19%
EBITDA growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1263.30%
EBITDA margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
63.31%
Operating income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.10%
Operating margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.49%
Other expenses growth while FYB.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
63.30%
Pre-tax income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.09%
Pre-tax margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2587.21%
Tax expense growth while FYB.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
75.50%
Net income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.69%
Net margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.28%
EPS growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.28%
Diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.00%
Share count change of 0.00% while FYB.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.