PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
601.18%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FYB.DE's 14.63%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
709.20%
Cost growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 40.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
411.37%
Positive growth while FYB.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-27.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.34%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 11.10%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
307.26%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 37.76%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.47%
D&A growth while FYB.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
82.42%
EBITDA growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
97.49%
EBITDA margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.24%
Operating income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.48%
Operating margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-20.03%
Other expenses reduction while FYB.DE shows 95.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
26.08%
Pre-tax income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.46%
Pre-tax margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-95.68%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
23.25%
Net income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.05%
Net margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
EPS growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.83%
Share count reduction below 50% of FYB.DE's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.83%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FYB.DE's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.