PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.82%
Revenue growth 50-75% of FYB.DE's 40.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-75.61%
Cost reduction while FYB.DE shows 47.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
422.90%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FYB.DE's 26.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
360.78%
Margin expansion while FYB.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while FYB.DE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
4389.34%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 17.82%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
37.76%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x FYB.DE's 31.65%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.75%
D&A growth while FYB.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.76%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.46%
Operating margin decline while FYB.DE shows 20.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.25%
Other expenses growth while FYB.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-80.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
105.56%
Tax expense growth less than half of FYB.DE's 3826.67%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-91.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-84.62%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-84.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.18%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FYB.DE's 23.13%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
4.18%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FYB.DE's 21.23%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.