PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-32.17%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-52.22%
Cost reduction while FYB.DE shows 7.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1528.49%
Positive growth while FYB.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2300.84%
Margin expansion while FYB.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1222.53%
Other expenses change of 1222.53% while FYB.DE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1265.89%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 12.85%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-44.90%
Total costs reduction while FYB.DE shows 9.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.79%
D&A reduction while FYB.DE shows 8.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-112.48%
EBITDA decline while FYB.DE shows 301.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.41%
EBITDA margin decline while FYB.DE shows 418.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
638.87%
Operating income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
989.30%
Operating margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-377.19%
Other expenses reduction while FYB.DE shows 2645.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-256.90%
Pre-tax income decline while FYB.DE shows 319.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-426.17%
Pre-tax margin decline while FYB.DE shows 441.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
199.11%
Tax expense growth while FYB.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-325.84%
Net income decline while FYB.DE shows 4001.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-527.80%
Net margin decline while FYB.DE shows 5196.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-204.02%
EPS decline while FYB.DE shows 4090.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-204.02%
Diluted EPS decline while FYB.DE shows 4090.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.18%
Share count reduction below 50% of FYB.DE's 1.34%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
40.18%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FYB.DE's 0.52%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.