PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-90.61%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-91.44%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-88.70%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.36%
Margin expansion while FYB.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while FYB.DE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.89%
Operating expenses reduction while FYB.DE shows 58.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-82.18%
Total costs reduction while FYB.DE shows 9.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while FYB.DE shows 498.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-36.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
18.05%
EBITDA growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-772.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-123.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-352.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
75.12%
Other expenses growth while FYB.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.34%
Pre-tax income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-684.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.99%
Tax expense reduction while FYB.DE shows 160.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.71%
Net income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-669.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.68%
EPS growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.68%
Diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.33%
Share count reduction while FYB.DE shows 7.78% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-14.33%
Diluted share reduction while FYB.DE shows 7.78% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.