PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.82%
Positive growth while PGN.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-75.61%
Cost reduction while PGN.DE shows 71.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
422.90%
Positive growth while PGN.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
360.78%
Margin expansion while PGN.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4389.34%
Operating expenses growth while PGN.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.76%
Total costs growth while PGN.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.75%
D&A growth while PGN.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.76%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.36%
Operating income decline while PGN.DE shows 148.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.46%
Operating margin decline while PGN.DE shows 156.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.25%
Other expenses growth while PGN.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-80.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
105.56%
Tax expense growth while PGN.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-91.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-84.62%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-84.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.18%
Share count change of 4.18% while PGN.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
4.18%
Diluted share change of 4.18% while PGN.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.