PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-32.17%
Revenue decline while VPLAY-B.ST shows 8.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-52.22%
Cost reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 6.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1528.49%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 53.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2300.84%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 41.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1222.53%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
1265.89%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 23.36%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-44.90%
Total costs reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 7.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.79%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-112.48%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-118.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
638.87%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 37.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
989.30%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 42.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-377.19%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-256.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-426.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
199.11%
Tax expense growth while VPLAY-B.ST reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-325.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-527.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-204.02%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-204.02%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
40.18%
Share count increase while VPLAY-B.ST reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.18%
Diluted share change of 40.18% while VPLAY-B.ST is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.