1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-90.61%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-91.44%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-88.70%
Gross profit decline while VPLAY-B.ST shows 68.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
20.36%
Margin expansion below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 78.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 92.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.89%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-82.18%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-36.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
18.05%
EBITDA growth below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 93.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-772.52%
EBITDA margin decline while VPLAY-B.ST shows 92.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-123.76%
Operating income decline while VPLAY-B.ST shows 79.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-352.99%
Operating margin decline while VPLAY-B.ST shows 77.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
75.12%
Other expenses growth while VPLAY-B.ST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.34%
Pre-tax income growth while VPLAY-B.ST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-684.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.99%
Tax expense reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 91.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.71%
Net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-669.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.68%
EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.68%
Diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.33%
Share count reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-14.33%
Diluted share reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.