1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-33.18%
Cash & equivalents declining -33.18% while ENPH's grows 16.52%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-100.00%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-40.04%
Below half of ENPH's 16.52%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
58.28%
Receivables growth 50-75% of ENPH's 99.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
-15.35%
Inventory growth below half of ENPH's 6.38%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-43.40%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.26%
Below half of ENPH's 28.73%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-4.95%
Below half ENPH's 31.82%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.10%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-11.47%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.60%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
20.10%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.02%
Less than half of ENPH's 252.75%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.89%
Below half of ENPH's 49.34%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.92%
Below half of ENPH's 32.43%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
13.18%
Less than half of ENPH's 114.09%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-23.96%
Less than half of ENPH's 13.89%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
65.52%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.40%
Below half of ENPH's -43.73%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
19.98%
Less than half of ENPH's 52.94%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-7.05%
Less than half of ENPH's 64.42%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
12.60%
Less than half of ENPH's 233.31%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.74%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.56%
Less than half of ENPH's -0.31%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
9.24%
Less than half of ENPH's 140.52%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.04%
Less than half of ENPH's 96.56%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.01%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-240.24%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's -14.55%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-4.28%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.29%
Below half ENPH's -22.33%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-3.92%
Below half ENPH's 32.43%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-6.22%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-4.16%
Less than half of ENPH's 169.79%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
17.78%
Less than half of ENPH's 43.41%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
