1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
3.57%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of ENPH's 17.55%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.57%
Below half of ENPH's 17.55%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-21.43%
Receivables growth less than half of ENPH's 46.75%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
2.59%
Inventory growth below half of ENPH's -1.99%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
67.17%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.37%
Below half of ENPH's 23.08%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
8.97%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 1.40%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.70%
50-75% of ENPH's -6.34%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-1.63%
Similar yoy changes to ENPH's -1.98%. Walter Schloss sees parallel intangible strategies or acquisitions.
30.60%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.82%
Less than half of ENPH's 48.56%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
6.60%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 3.38%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.98%
Below half of ENPH's 18.12%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-1.19%
Less than half of ENPH's 11.35%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-33.27%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.57%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.93%
Below half of ENPH's 10.82%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
0.26%
Less than half of ENPH's -3.96%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
33.14%
Similar yoy to ENPH's 34.35%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
-7.13%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.28%
Below half ENPH's 12.34%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.94%
Above 1.5x ENPH's -2.08%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-4.78%
Less than half of ENPH's 3.48%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.70%
Less than half of ENPH's 21.04%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
2.26%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.14%
Below half ENPH's -0.36%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
28.58%
Less than half of ENPH's -1.27%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.55%
Below half ENPH's 10.84%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
5.98%
Below half ENPH's 18.12%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
30.26%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
-4.55%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-13.61%
Less than half of ENPH's 45.12%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
