1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-19.29%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-19.29% vs ENPH's -29.47%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
100.00%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
-19.29%
Cash + STI yoy 0.5-0.75x ENPH's -29.47%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging short-term reserves. Confirm debt coverage.
-31.50%
Receivables growth less than half of ENPH's 11.89%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
12.62%
Inventory growth above 1.5x ENPH's 7.82%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
39.56%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.14%
Below half of ENPH's 0.20%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.46%
Below half ENPH's -1.24%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
145.59%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
273.96%
Less than half of ENPH's -6.70%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
201.09%
Less than half of ENPH's -2.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-0.27%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
2239.27%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
11.40%
Less than half of ENPH's 63.07%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
8.24%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 3.47%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.05%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's 0.92%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
3.89%
Less than half of ENPH's -5.11%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
68.77%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-50.26%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.42%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's -2.76%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
7.52%
Less than half of ENPH's -8.81%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-0.75%
Less than half of ENPH's -5.44%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
4.22%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.85%
Below half ENPH's 10.93%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.27%
Less than half of ENPH's -0.85%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
4.20%
Similar yoy to ENPH's 4.08%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in long-term liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Less than half of ENPH's -1.93%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.74%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.99%
Below half ENPH's 0.37%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
18.54%
Less than half of ENPH's 47.25%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.28%
Below half ENPH's 8.65%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.05%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's 0.92%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
-0.00%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
4.50%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
36.33%
50-75% of ENPH's 63.12%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.
