1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
6.29%
Cash & equivalents growing 6.29% while ENPH's declined -36.67%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.29%
Below half of ENPH's -36.67%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-1.03%
Receivables growth less than half of ENPH's 4.07%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
20.97%
Inventory growth below half of ENPH's -13.78%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
22.55%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.89%
Below half of ENPH's -7.48%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
5.03%
Similar yoy growth to ENPH's 4.94%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital spending strategies. Check utilization rates.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.96%
50-75% of ENPH's -9.04%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-2.86%
Similar yoy changes to ENPH's -3.18%. Walter Schloss sees parallel intangible strategies or acquisitions.
5.16%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.18%
Less than half of ENPH's 14.42%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
5.35%
Similar yoy growth to ENPH's 5.34%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions in non-current assets.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.58%
Below half of ENPH's -3.79%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-2.18%
Less than half of ENPH's 54.82%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
484.94%
Less than half of ENPH's -37.75%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
1438.91%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-78.90%
Below half of ENPH's 4.83%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
180.36%
Exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 1.13%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
30.58%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 5.84%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
5.01%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.13%
Below half ENPH's 7.29%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.65%
Less than half of ENPH's 1.59%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.48%
Less than half of ENPH's 4.57%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
12.33%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 5.33%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.40%
Similar yoy to ENPH's -8.28%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
-0.02%
Less than half of ENPH's 50.50%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.10%
Below half ENPH's -51.26%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
7.58%
Below half ENPH's -3.79%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
5.16%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
21.02%
Less than half of ENPH's -37.75%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
27.38%
Less than half of ENPH's -39.76%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
