1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-18.95%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-18.95% vs MAXN's -43.59%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-96.67%
Both MAXN and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-18.95%
Below half of MAXN's -43.59%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
25.27%
Receivables growth less than half of MAXN's -32.55%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
24.66%
Inventory growth below half of MAXN's -73.09%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
416.78%
Other current assets growth < half of MAXN's 3886.20%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
17.64%
≥ 1.5x MAXN's 1.49%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
3.25%
Below half MAXN's -35.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
66.96%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.61%
1.25-1.5x MAXN's -10.90%. Martin Whitman sees potential overreliance on intangible expansions vs. competitor.
57.83%
Less than half of MAXN's -10.90%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
10.67%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating better performance.
18232.75%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
46.65%
Less than half of MAXN's -78.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
26.22%
Below half of MAXN's -38.49%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.14%
Below half of MAXN's -14.75%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
9.52%
Less than half of MAXN's -46.16%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
29.22%
Less than half of MAXN's -84.57%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-33.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Below half of MAXN's 133.38%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-31.91%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
16.11%
Less than half of MAXN's 42.78%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
47.21%
Less than half of MAXN's -4.63%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.47%
50-75% of MAXN's -24.03%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
120.06%
Less than half of MAXN's -66.85%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
59.86%
Less than half of MAXN's -20.46%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.63%
Above 1.5x MAXN's 2.71%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.00%
Below half MAXN's -8.12%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
118.49%
Less than half of MAXN's -49.45%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.36%
Below half MAXN's -39.22%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
22.14%
Below half MAXN's -14.75%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
10.63%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating better performance.
43.80%
Less than half of MAXN's -2.20%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
271.59%
Above 1.5x MAXN's 5.73%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
