1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-19.29%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-19.29% vs MAXN's -43.59%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
100.00%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating better performance.
-19.29%
Below half of MAXN's -43.59%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-31.50%
Similar receivables growth to MAXN's -32.55%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
12.62%
Inventory growth below half of MAXN's -73.09%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
39.56%
Other current assets growth < half of MAXN's 3886.20%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-6.14%
Below half of MAXN's 1.49%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.46%
Below half MAXN's -35.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
145.59%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
273.96%
Less than half of MAXN's -10.90%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
201.09%
Less than half of MAXN's -10.90%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-0.27%
Both MAXN and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
2239.27%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
11.40%
Less than half of MAXN's -78.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
8.24%
Below half of MAXN's -38.49%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.05%
Below half of MAXN's -14.75%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
3.89%
Less than half of MAXN's -46.16%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
68.77%
Less than half of MAXN's -84.57%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-50.26%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.42%
Below half of MAXN's 133.38%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
7.52%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.75%
Less than half of MAXN's 42.78%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
4.22%
Less than half of MAXN's -4.63%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-1.85%
Below half MAXN's -93.06%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.27%
Less than half of MAXN's -66.85%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
4.20%
Less than half of MAXN's -20.46%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Similar yoy to MAXN's 2.71%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total liabilities.
0.74%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.99%
1.25-1.5x MAXN's -8.12%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
18.54%
Less than half of MAXN's -49.45%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.28%
Below half MAXN's -39.22%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.05%
Below half MAXN's -14.75%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-0.00%
Both MAXN and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
4.50%
Less than half of MAXN's -2.20%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
36.33%
Above 1.5x MAXN's 5.73%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
