PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Reveals whether the business's core operations generate sufficient cash to cover expenses, fund growth, and return capital to shareholders. Sustainable free cash flow is often a key indicator of long-term value creation.
-0.24
Negative OCF/share while SEDG has 1.42. Joel Greenblatt would question the viability of operations in comparison.
-0.41
Negative FCF/share while SEDG stands at 1.06. Joel Greenblatt would demand structural changes or cost cuts.
-70.41%
Negative ratio while SEDG is 25.38%. Joel Greenblatt would question whether the firm’s OCF is negative or capex is abnormally large.
2.40
1.25–1.5x SEDG's 1.65. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate if the competitor’s accruals hide weaker conversions.
-12.61%
Negative ratio while SEDG is 16.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s revenues or cash flows are fundamentally flawed.