PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Reveals whether the business's core operations generate sufficient cash to cover expenses, fund growth, and return capital to shareholders. Sustainable free cash flow is often a key indicator of long-term value creation.
-0.23
Negative OCF/share while SEDG has 0.56. Joel Greenblatt would question the viability of operations in comparison.
-0.25
Both firms show negative FCF/share. Martin Whitman might see an industry-wide capital intensity challenge.
-11.71%
Negative ratio while SEDG is 129.86%. Joel Greenblatt would question whether the firm’s OCF is negative or capex is abnormally large.
-0.98
Negative ratio while SEDG is 0.65. Joel Greenblatt would check if we have far worse cash coverage of earnings.
-15.89%
Negative ratio while SEDG is 8.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s revenues or cash flows are fundamentally flawed.