PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Reveals whether the business's core operations generate sufficient cash to cover expenses, fund growth, and return capital to shareholders. Sustainable free cash flow is often a key indicator of long-term value creation.
-0.32
Negative OCF/share while SEDG has 1.40. Joel Greenblatt would question the viability of operations in comparison.
-0.40
Negative FCF/share while SEDG stands at 0.52. Joel Greenblatt would demand structural changes or cost cuts.
-25.35%
Negative ratio while SEDG is 62.87%. Joel Greenblatt would question whether the firm’s OCF is negative or capex is abnormally large.
1.31
Below 0.5x SEDG's 5.13. Michael Burry would expect an eventual correction in reported profits.
-13.36%
Negative ratio while SEDG is 10.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s revenues or cash flows are fundamentally flawed.