PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
60.74%
Net income growth under 50% of CSIQ's 158.41%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
486.93%
D&A growth of 486.93% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.09%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CSIQ is 36.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.50%
Inventory growth of 13.50% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Negative yoy usage while CSIQ is 36.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-138.82%
Negative yoy while CSIQ is 126.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-100.51%
Negative yoy CFO while CSIQ is 171.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
5.26%
Some CapEx rise while CSIQ is negative at -1.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
842.50%
Growth well above CSIQ's 33.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
9.37%
Investing outflow well above CSIQ's 4.41%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
433.72%
Issuance growth of 433.72% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.