PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1011.42%
Some net income increase while CSIQ is negative at -84.27%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.21%
Some D&A expansion while CSIQ is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
1625.45%
Well above CSIQ's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
2.00%
SBC growth while CSIQ is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-150.07%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CSIQ at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
2643.30%
AR growth well above CSIQ's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-87.48%
Negative yoy inventory while CSIQ is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-114.07%
Negative yoy AP while CSIQ is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
24.24%
Some yoy usage while CSIQ is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-72.18%
Both negative yoy, with CSIQ at -299.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
53.52%
Some CFO growth while CSIQ is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
45.27%
Lower CapEx growth vs. CSIQ's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
69.34%
Some acquisitions while CSIQ is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-540.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while CSIQ is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
47.56%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. CSIQ's 100.00%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-162.72%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CSIQ is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1837.91%
We cut yoy buybacks while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.