PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1379.79%
Net income growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 86.80%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.08%
D&A growth of 7.08% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
63.39%
Deferred tax of 63.39% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
2.82%
SBC growth of 2.82% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
45.46%
Working capital change of 45.46% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
32.89%
AR growth of 32.89% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
1158.73%
Inventory growth of 1158.73% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-20.76%
Negative yoy AP while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.36%
Growth of 155.36% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-21.86%
Both negative yoy, with CSIQ at -93.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
75.45%
CFO growth of 75.45% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
-89.74%
Negative yoy CapEx while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
83.03%
Acquisition growth of 83.03% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.44%
Growth of 96.44% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-26.82%
We reduce yoy invests while CSIQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-100.08%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.63%
Buyback growth of 65.63% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.