PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.11%
Net income growth under 50% of CSIQ's 78.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.89%
Negative yoy D&A while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
245.51%
Deferred tax of 245.51% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.27%
Both cut yoy SBC, with CSIQ at -24.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
20.77%
Working capital change of 20.77% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-385.45%
AR is negative yoy while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-430.46%
Negative yoy inventory while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
63.23%
AP growth of 63.23% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
59.72%
Growth of 59.72% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-383.13%
Both negative yoy, with CSIQ at -68.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
18.87%
CFO growth of 18.87% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
-1.71%
Negative yoy CapEx while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
97.83%
Acquisition growth of 97.83% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
21.68%
We expand invests by 21.68% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
512.16%
Debt repayment growth of 512.16% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.79%
Buyback growth of 95.79% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.