PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
205.27%
Net income growth under 50% of CSIQ's 465.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-6.85%
Negative yoy D&A while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CSIQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
10.66%
Less SBC growth vs. CSIQ's 45.83%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
12.88%
Working capital change of 12.88% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-598.75%
AR is negative yoy while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
51.13%
Inventory growth of 51.13% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
180.11%
AP growth of 180.11% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
52.74%
Growth of 52.74% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-513.32%
Both negative yoy, with CSIQ at -548.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
45.61%
CFO growth of 45.61% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
19.82%
CapEx growth of 19.82% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.64%
We reduce yoy other investing while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
74.10%
We expand invests by 74.10% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
61.07%
Debt repayment growth of 61.07% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.27%
Buyback growth of 87.27% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.